Please activate JavaScript!
Please install Adobe Flash Player, click here for download

Journal of Oral Science & Rehabilitation No. 4, 2016

Journal of Oral Science & Rehabilitation 40 Volume 2 | Issue 4/2016 I m p l a n t s u r f a c e s a n d b l a s t e d w i t h t i t a n i u m d i o x i d e m i c r o p a r t i c l e s 8. Le Guéhennec L, Soueidan A, Layrolle P, Amouriq Y. Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration. → Dent Mater. 2007 Jul;23(7):844–54. 9. Ellingsen JE, Johansson CB, Wennerberg A, Holmén A. Improved retention and bone-to-implant contact with fluoride-mo- dified titanium implants. → Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007 Jul;23(7):844–54. 10. Abrahamsson I, Albouy JP, Berglundh T. Healing at fluoride-modified implants placed in wide marginal defects: an experimental study in dogs. → Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Feb;19(2):153–9. 11. Stanford CM, Johnson GK, Fakhry A, Gratton D, Mellonig JT, Wanger W. Outcomes of a fluoride modified implant one year after loading in the posterior-ma- xilla when placed with the osteotome surgical technique. → Appl Osseointegr Res. 2006;5:50–55. 12. Variola F, Brunski JB, Orsini G, Tambasco de Oliveira P, Wazen R, Nanci A. Nanoscale surface modifications of medically-rele- vant metals: state-of-the art and perspectives. → Nanoscale. 2011 Feb;3(2):335–53. 13. Binon PP. Implants and components: entering the new millennium. → Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000 Jan-Feb;15(1):76–94. 14. Bressan E, Sbricoli L, Guazzo R, Tocco I, Roman M, Vindigni V, Stellini E, Gardin C, Ferroni L, Sivolella S, Zavan B. Nanostruc- tured surfaces of dental implants. → Int J Mol Sci. 2013 Jan 17;14(1):1918–31. 15. Aparicio C, Gil FJ, Fonseca C, Barbosa M, Planell JA. Corrosion behavior of commercially pure titanium shot blasted with different materials and size of shot particles for dental implant applications. → Biomaterials. 2003 Jan;24(2):263–73. 16. Esposito M, Hirsch JM, Lekholm U, Thomsen P. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (II). Etiopathogenesis. → Eur J Oral Sci. 1998 Jun;106(3):721–64. 17. Johansson C, Albrektsson T, Thomsen P, Sennerby L, Lodding A, Odelius H. Tissue reactions to titanium-6 aluminum-4 vanadium alloy. → Eur J Exp Musculoskel Res. 1992;1:161–9. 18. Ivanoff CJ, Hallgren C, Widmark G, Sennerby L, Wennerberg A. Histologic evaluation of the bone integration of TiO2 blasted and turned titanium microimplants in humans. → Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001 Apr;12(2):128–34. 19. Rasmusson L, Kahnberg KE, Tan A. Effects of implant design and surface on bone regeneration and implant stability: an experimental study in the dog mandible. → Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2001 Jan;3(1):2–8. 20. Gehrke SA, Taschieri S, Del Fabbro M, Coel- ho PG. Positive biomechanical effects of titanium oxide for sandblasting implant surface as an alternative to aluminium oxide. → J Oral Implantol. 2015 Oct;41(5):515–22. 21. Piattelli A, Degidi M, Paolantonio M, Mangano C, Scarano A. Residual aluminum oxide on the surface of titanium implants has no effect on osseointegration. → Biomaterials. 2003 Oct;24(22):4081–9. 22. Cochran DL, Buser D, ten Bruggenkate CM, Weingart D, Taylor TM, Bernard JP, Peters F, Simpson JP. The use of reduced healing times on ITI implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface: early results from clinical trials on ITI SLA implants. → Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002 Apr;13(2):144–53. 23. Misch CE. Density of bone: effect on treatment plans, surgical approach, healing, and progressive bone loading. → Int J Oral Implantol. 1990;6(2):23–31. 24. Hsu SH, Liu BS, Lin WH, Chiang HC, Huang SC, Cheng SS. Characterization and biocompatibility of a titanium dental implant with a laser irradiated and dual-acid etched surface. → Biomed Mater Eng. 2007;17(1):53–68. 25. Albrektsson T, Brånemark PI, Hansson HA, Lindström J. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. → Acta Orthop Scand. 1981;52(2):155–70. 26. Textor M, Sittig C, Frauchiger V, Tosatti S, Brunette DM. Properties and biological significance of natural oxide films on titanium and its alloys. → In: Brunette DM, Tengvall P, Textor M, Thomsen P, editors. Titanium in medicine. Berlin: Springer; 2001. p. 171–230. 27. Ivanoff CJ, Widmark G, Johansson C, Wennerberg A. Histologic evaluation of bone response to oxidized and turned titanium micro-implants in human jawbone. → Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003 May-Jun;18(3):341–8. 28. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Johansson C, Andersson B. Experimental study of turned and grit-blasted screw-shaped implants with special emphasis on effects of blasting material and surface topography. → Biomaterials. 1996 Jan;17(1):15–22. 29. Thomson GJ, Puleo DA. Ti-6Al-4V ion solution inhibition of osteogenic cell phenotype as a function of differentiation time course in vitro. → Biomaterials. 1996 Oct;17(20):1949–54. 30. Stea S, Savarino L, Toni A, Sudanese A, Giunti A, Pizzoferrato A. Microradiographic and histochemical evaluation of mineralization inhibition at the bone–alu- mina interface. → Biomaterials. 1992;13(10):664–7. 31. Capdevielle MC, Hart LE, Goff J, Scanes CG. Aluminum and acid effects on calcium and phosphorus metabolism in young growing chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus) and mallard ducks (Anas platyrhynchos). → Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 1998 Jul;35(1):82–8. 32. Bushinsky DA, Sprague SM, Hallegot P, Girod C, Chabala JM, Levi-Setti R. Effects of aluminum on bone surface ion composition. → J Bone Miner Res. 1995 Dec;10(12):1988–97. 33. Nimb L, Jensen JS, Gotfredsen K. Interface mechanics and histomorphometric analysis of hydroxyapatite-coated and porous glass-ceramic implants in canine bone. → J Biomed Mater Res. 1995 Dec;29(12):1477–82. 34. Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: Part 1—review focusing on topog- raphic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them. → Int J Prosthodont. 2004 Sep-Oct;17(5):536–43. 35. Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: Part 2—review focusing on clinical knowledge of different surfaces. → Int J Prosthodont. 2004 Sep-Oct;17(5):544–64. 36. Buser D, Broggini N, Wieland M, Schenk RK, Denzer AJ, Cochran DL, Hoffmann B, Lussi A, Steinemann SG. Enhanced bone apposition to a chemically modified SLA titanium surface. → J Dent Res. 2004 Jul;83(7):529–33. 37. Gotfredsen K, Nimb L, Hjörting-Hansen E, Jensen JS, Holmén A. Histomorphometric and removal torque analysis for TiO2-blasted titanium implants. An experimental study on dogs. → Clin Oral Implants Res. 1992 Jun;3(2):77–84. 38. Darvell BW, Samman N, Luk WK, Clark RK, Tideman H. Contamination of titanium castings by aluminium oxide blasting. → J Dent. 1995 Oct;23(5):319–22. 39. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Andersson B. Bone tissue response to commercially pure titanium implants blasted with fine and coarse particles of aluminum oxide. → Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996 Jan-Feb;11(1):38–45. 40. Sennerby L, Dasmah A, Larsson B, Iverhed M. Bone tissue responses to surface-modi- fied zirconia implants: a histomorphomet- ric and removal torque study in the rabbit. → Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2005;7 Suppl 1:S13–20. 41. Piattelli A, Manzon L, Scarano A, Paolantonio M, Piattelli M. Histologic and histomorphometric analysis of the bone response to machined and sandblasted titanium implants: an experimental study in rabbits. → Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998 Nov-Dec;13(6):805–10. 42. Meredith N, Shagaldi F, Alleyne D, Sennerby L, Cawley P. The application of resonance frequency measurements to study the stability of titanium implants during healing in the rabbit tibia. → Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997 Jun;8(3):234–43. 43. Pearce AI, Richards RG, Milz S, Schneider E, Pearce SG. Animal models for implant biomaterial research in bone: a review. → Eur Cell Mater. 2007 Mar;13:1–10. 44. Steigenga J, Al-Shammari K, Misch C, Nociti FH Jr, Wang HL. Effects of implant thread geometry on percentage of osseointegration and resistance to reverse torque in the tibia of rabbits. → J Periodontol. 2004 Sep;75(9):1233–41. 45. Meredith N. Assessment of implant stability as a prognostic determinant. → Int J Prosthodont. 1998 Sep-Oct;11(5):491–501. References

Pages Overview