CDIT0310

29dentistry 3_2010 cosmetic _bibliografia 1. WittnebenJG,WrightRF,WeberHP,GallucciGO.Asystema- tic review of the clinical performance of CAD/CAM single- tooth restorations. Int J Prosthodont 2009;22(5):466-71. 2. Koutayas SO, Vagkopoulou T, Pelekanos S, Koidis P, Strub JR. Zirconia in dentistry: part 2. Evidence-based clinical breakthrough. Eur J Esthet Dent 2009;4(4):348-80. 3. Raigrodski AJ. Contemporary materials and technologies for all-ceramic fixed partial dentures: a review of the lite- rature. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92(6):557-62. 4. Strub JR, Rekow ED, Witkowski S. Computer-aided design andfabricationofdentalrestorations:currentsystemsand futurepossibilities.JAmDentAssoc2006;137(9):1289-96. 5. Rekow ED. A review of the developments in dental CAD/ CAM systems. Curr Opin Dent 1992;2:25-33. 6. Zarone F, Sorrentino R, Vaccaro F, Russo S, De Simone G. Retrospective clinical evaluation of 86 Procera AllCeram anterior single crowns on natural and implant-supported abutments. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005;7 Suppl 1:S95-103. 7. Davis DM, Packer ME, Watson RM. Maintenance requi- rements of implant-supported fixed prostheses opposed by implant-supported fixed prostheses, natural teeth, or complete dentures: a 5-year retrospective study. Int J Pro- sthodont 2003;16(5):521-3. 8. Koutayas SO, Kakaboura A, Hussein A, Strub JR. Colorime- tric evaluation of the influence of five different restorative materials on the color of veneered densely sintered alumi- na. J Esthet Restor Dent 2003;15(6):353-60. 9. Walter MH, Wolf BH, Wolf AE, Boening KW. Six-year cli- nical performance of all-ceramic crowns with alumina cores. Int J Prosthodont 2006;19(2):162-3. 10. Vult von Steyern P. All-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Studies on aluminum oxide- and zirconium dioxide-based ceramic systems. Swed Dent J Suppl 2005;(173):1-69. 11. Suárez MJ, Lozano JF, Paz Salido M, Martínez F. Three-year clinical evaluation of In-Ceram Zirconia posterior FPDs. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17(1):35-8. 12. Heydecke G, Sierraalta M, Razzoog ME. Evolution and use of aluminum oxide single-tooth implant abutments: a short review and presentation of two cases. Int J Prostho- dont 2002;15(5):488-93. 13. Al-Wahadni AM, Hussey DL, Grey N, Hatamleh MM. Frac- ture resistance of aluminium oxide and lithium disilicate- based crowns using different luting cements: an in vitro study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2009;10(2):51-8. 14. Blatz MB, Oppes S, Chiche G, Holst S, Sadan A. Influence of cementation technique on fracture strength and leakage of alumina all-ceramic crowns after cyclic loading. Quin- tessence Int 2008;39:23-32. 15. Blatz MB, Sadan A, Arch GH Jr, Lang BR. In vitro evaluation of long-term bonding of Procera AllCeram alumina resto- rations with a modified resin luting agent. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:381-7. 16. Blatz MB, Sadan A, Kern M. Resin-ceramic bonding: a re- view of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:268-74. 17. Canay S, Hersek N, Ertan A. Effect of different acid treat- mentsonaporcelainsurface.JOralRehabil2001;28:95-101. Fig. 20 Fig. 21 Fig. 22 Fig. 20_Le cappette in allumina dei 4 incisivi superiori (foto al centro) hanno spessori molto sottili e forme svariate: questo è fondamentale perché permette di rispettare al massimo i tessuti dentali sani e di adattare la forma della preparazione al caso clinico. Le figure a destra e a sinistra rappresentano le cappette, prodotte in Svezia, posizionate sul modello a monconi sfilabili. Fig. 21_Dopo aver stratificato la ceramica di rivestimento, le faccette sono pronte per essere cementate definitivamente in bocca.Anche in questo caso, le immagini a destra e a sinistra rappresentano i manufatti finiti, posizionati sul modello a monconi sfilabili. Fig. 22_Il risultato finale mostra il notevole cambiamento estetico e morfologico ottenuto: le immagini a destra e a sinistra sono state effettuate subito dopo la cementazione; mentre la foto al centro è stata effettuata durante un controllo a distanza di 15 giorni dalla cementazione definitiva. case report_CAD-CAM