Please activate JavaScript!
Please install Adobe Flash Player, click here for download

Dental Tribune UK Edition, October 25-3, 2010, No.26 Vol.4

and each detail. Conclusion to Part 1 We have given you an overview of the technical aspects of tel- escopic prostheses or double crowns and their almost uni- versal applicability. The basic priciples of how they work and the importance of achieving the right level of friction are de- scribed. Success is dependent on good communication and technical skill on both the den- tists and the technical labora- tory’s part. In the next article of “Part 2 of precision dental prosthetics with highly engineered con- nections” we will illustrate the clinical side to the telescopes or double crowns, i.e. the planning and preparation required. DT page 23DTß About the author Ulrich Heker is the owner-manager of Ulrich Heker Dental Laboratory founded in 1996 with the strap line TEETH ‘R’ US. As a qualified master craftsman (Ger- man Master Dental Technician) since 1991, he has over 26 years’ experience both at the bench and in running a successful business. Ulrich lives in Mülheim on the river Ruhr and is an accomplished ‘western- style’ rider in his spare time. Ulrich is fluent in English and can easily be contacted at: http://www.german- smile.info, or you can email Ulrich@ Teethrus.de Verena Tunn- Salihoglu,was born close to Stuttgart, Germany. During her training at the Albert-Ludwigs- University in Freiburg, Germany, she developed a keen interest in prostho- dontics,, especially in partial dentures and telescopes. Now her main interest is the integration of holistic dentistry on a high precision dental quality level. Verena is fluent in English and can eas- ily be contacted at: oldmachardental@ gmx.com References 1. Becker, H: Einflüsse des umgebenden Mediums auf das Haftverhalten telesko- pierender Kronen. Zahnärztl Welt 91, 54, (1982). 2. Becker, H: Wirkungsmechanis- mus der Haftung teleskopierender Kronen. Zahnärztl. Prax 34, 281 (1983). 3. Böttger, H: Das Teleskopsystem in der zahnärztli- chen Prothetik. JA Barth, Leipzig 1961. 4. Diedrichs, G: Ist das Teleskopsystem noch zeitgemäß? Zahnärztl. Welt 99, 78 (1990). 5. Goslee, H: Principles and Practice of Crown and Bridge Work Dental Items of Interest Publishing Co., New York 1923. 6. Hedegard, B: Die Mitarbeit des Patienten – ein Planungsfaktor. Zahnärztl. Welt, Ref.88, 680 (1979). 7. Jacoby, W, Gasser, F: Nachträgliche Haltverbesserung von Teleskopkronen. Quintessenz 24, 59 (1973). 8. Jüde, HD, Kühl, W, Roßbach, A: Einführung in die zahnärztliche Prothetik. 5.Aufl. Deutscher Ärzte- Verlag, Köln 1996. 9. Kammertöns, H: Haftreibungsprüfung an Teleskop- und Konuskronenarbeiten. Quintessenz Zahntech 14, 11 (1988). 10. Krämer, A, Weber, H: Präzisionselemente in der Teilprothetik Teleskopierende Sys- teme. Zahnärztl Mitt 80, 2328 (1990). 11. Mack, H: Die teleskopierende Verankerung in der Teilprothetik. Quintessenz Zahntech 9, 17 (1983). 12. Peeso, FA: Crown and Bridgework. Henry Kimpton, London 1924. 13. Schreiber, S: Die Verankerung von Teilprothesen mit Teleskopkronen. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 14, 983-988 (1959). 14. Schwanewede von, H, Anderseck, E: Prote- za Teleskopowa – Die Teleskopprothese im stark reduzierten Lückengebiß. Prot Stom 35, 166 (1985). 15. Stüttgen, U, Hupfauf, L: Kombiniert festsitzend – abnehmbarer Zahnersatz. In: Horch, H-H, Hupfauf, L, Ketterl, W, Schmuth,G, (Hrsg): Praxis der Zahnheilkunde 6 (Teilprothesen), 2. Aufl. Urban & Schwarzenberg, München Wien – Baltimore 1988, S.163. 16. Wup- per, H: Zur Biomechanik verschiedener Verankerungssysteme – Grundsätze zur Indikation von Geschieben, Stegen und Teleskopen. Zahnärztl Welt 95, 36 (1986). Single Telescope with retention, showing primary and secondary telescope Copies upper jaw polishes for modelling the outer crowns Ems-swissqualitY.com For more information> www.ems-swissquality.com savE cEllsNEw Ems swiss iNstrumENts surgErY – saviNg tissuE with NEw iNNovatioNs iN implaNt dENtistrY The inventor of the Original Piezon Method has won another battle against the destruction of tissue when dental implants are performed. The magic word is dual cooling – instrument cooling from the inside and outside together with simultane- ous debris evacuation and efficient surgical preparations in the maxilla. cooliNg hEals A unique spiral design and internal irrigation prevent the instrument’s temperature from rising during the surgical procedure. These features combine effectively to promote excel- lent regeneration of the bone tissue. EMS Swiss Instruments Surgery MB4, MB5 and MB6 are diamond- coated cylindrical instruments for secondary surgical preparation (MB4, MB5) and final osteotomy (MB6). A spiral design combined with innovative dual cooling makes these instruments unique in implant dentistry. coNtrol savEs Effective instrument control fosters atraumatic implant preparation and minimizes any potential damage to the bone tissue. prEcisioN rEassurEs Selective cutting represents virtually no risk of damage to soft tissue (membranes, nerves, blood vessels, etc.). An optimum view of the operative site and minimal bleeding thanks to cavitation (hemostatic effect!) further enhance efficacy. The new EMS Swiss Instruments Surgery stand for unequaled Swiss precision and innovation for the benefit of dental practitioners and patients alike – the very philosophy embraced by EMS. > EMS Swiss Instrument Surgery MB6 with unique spiral design and internal instrument irrigation for ultralow temperature at the operative site October 25-31, 201024 United Kingdom EditionClinical